Jason Matthews
Graduate Student

Current Address
Karolinska Institutet
Department of Biosciences at Novum
SE-141 57 HUDDINGE, Sweden

Education
Ph.D. Biochemistry and
Environmental Toxicology. October 2001

B.Sc. Toxicology with Environmental Science at the University of Western Ontario. June 1997.

 

Dissertation

Molecular Basis of Estrogenic Endocrine Disruptor-Estrogen Receptor
Interactions: A Comparison Among Species

In recent years, there has been heightened concern that environmental exposure to estrogen mimicking chemicals, known as estrogenic endocrine disruptors (EEDs) may cause adverse health effects in humans and wildlife. Many of the effects of EEDs are mediated through the estrogen receptor (ER). Although the physiological actions of the ER are conserved among species, variation within the amino acid sequence of ligand binding domains suggests that species may exhibit different responses and sensitivities to EEDs.


Species-specific responses to EEDs were first examined in competitive binding assays using glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-ER fusion proteins from several different species. Fusion proteins consisted of the ER D, E, and F domains of human alpha (GST-hERadef), mouse alpha (GST-mERadef), chicken (GST-cERdef), green anole (GST-aERdef) and rainbow trout ERs (GST-rtERadef). Although, the fusion proteins exhibited similar binding preferences for many EEDs, several differences were observed. The GST-rtERadef, which has the greatest amino acid sequence variability in its ligand binding domain compared to hERadef, exhibited the most striking differences compared to the other GST-ERs. The ability of several of these EEDs to induce gene expression mediated by the various ERs was then examined in MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with Gal4-ERdef chimeric receptors. Overall, the data in the gene expression assay correlated with the competitive binding results. However, there were examples where EEDs bound to GST-ERs but were unable to significantly induce ER-mediated gene expression. Intriguingly, the E2-induced response mediated by Gal4-rtERadef was 2 orders of magnitude lower compared to the other receptors examined. Much of this effect was due to temperature, since when compared to hERa the 280-fold difference at 37oC was reduced to only 9-fold at 20oC. A comparison of their ligand binding pockets identified two conservative amino acid substitutions in rtERa (M317, I496) and hERa (L349, M528). The effect of these substitutions on ligand binding and transactivation was examined by constructing reciprocal mutants. The rtERadef M317L:I496M mutant exhibited a hERa phenotype with increased E2 binding affinity and transactivation ability at higher temperatures. The hERa L349M:M528I mutant also exhibited a modest trend towards adopting the rtERa phenotype. The lack of a complete exchange of phenotypes indicates that factors outside of the ligand binding pocket are also involved.

Taken together these results demonstrate that ERs from different vertebrate species exhibit different affinities and transactivation responses to EEDs. Since few differences were observed, these data do not preclude the use of a single surrogate ER to examine estrogenic responses for all vertebrate species. The present report also highlights the impact of temperature when comparing functional characteristics of proteins from poikilothermic species, such as rainbow trout, and humans.