Teaching



Biochemistry 101: Meet the Profs


This course is designed to acquaint biochemistry majors with department faculty and facilities. A major focus of the department is on research, and there are many opportunities for independent study with biochemistry faculty. Meeting the faculty in BCH 101 is an opportunity to learn about individual research programs, and interested students are encouraged to talk with faculty about the possibility of doing independent research. This pracitical training will advance a student's education and improve a resume. Working in a laboratory is fun, fascinating, and exciting. It is also a great way to "shrink" the size of a huge university and to meet interesting people.

Biochemistry 472: A laboratory course in recombinant DNA techniques

Biochemistry 472 was developed by Dr. Zachary Burton and Dr. Jon Kaguni who have also co-authored a textbook based on the experiments used in this course. The text is entitled Experiments in Molecular Biology: Biochemical Applications, and it is published by Academic Press. The purpose of the course is to give an intensive and rigorous experience to undergraduates in recombinant DNA laboratory techniques, and to augment the laboratory experience with related theoretical material. One goal of the course is to prepare gifted and highly motivated students for graduate study in biochemistry or a related field. This course is taught by Dr. Laurie Kaguni, Dr. Burton, Dr. William Henry and Dr. Neil Bowlby in the Fall Semester.

Philosophy of Teaching

I have been very interested in the process by which people acquire information. My experience teaching at MSU over the last 12 years has significantly altered my views on this subject. Initially, I thought that teachers teach and students learn, but if this is the correct paradigm, the process is somewhat inefficient--and much more efficient for some students than for others. I have come to the belief that education is a motivational problem and that the most important variable in the education equations:

1) (material learned)/(material taught) x 100 % = efficiency

2) (material learned) = (material taught) - (material never learned) - (material forgot) is the student.

I view the educational process as a partnership between teacher and student. Teachers analyze, organize and present material for students, but in order to learn the material, the individual student must go through a very similar intellectual process to that of the teacher in the original preparation of the lesson. Literally, the student must teach themselves the material. Once I realized that education is self-inflicted, the process became much more clear to me. (This realization also taught me much about myself.) This view of teaching and learning explains why the efficiency calculation is resistant to modifications in teaching methods but sensitive to student motivation. Swelling or shrinking the denominator by ten percent is not as important as doubling the numerator (equation 1). This also indicates the importance of studying. In this paradigm the student bears greater responsibility for his or her own education. If education is something we do to ourselves, then teacher and student are in the enterprise together. In the final analysis, teacher and student may have no one to blame but themselves.

Questions and Problem Solving in Learning

Teachers ask students many questions, and teachers also ask many questions of themselves. Teachers use skill in asking questions as an initial and powerful step in problem solving. The value of asking a question is that it clarifies the problem that you want to solve, it primes your mind to receive the answer, and asking the question gives you a personal stake in obtaining the answer. Asking the question, therefore, solves the motivational problem because once you have asked a question, the problem becomes your problem. As a further display of the power of interrogation, often simply asking a question is enough to supply the answer or, alternately, to suggest a simple approach by research or experimentation to find a desired answer. Developing skill at designing and asking questions makes people more curious, more analytical, and more highly motivated to do intellectual work. For these reasons, teaching interrogative skills is an insidious, seductive and powerful approach to develop problem solving skills.

One problem with our educational system is that we do not receive formal instruction or encouragement in designing and asking questions. I believe about one third of our school curriculum from the earliest grades should be devoted to this necessary life skill. Asking questions is essential for interpersonal relationships, business, crime detection, interviewing, mathematics, teaching, and science. Where information is concerned, literally, if you don't ask, you don't get! In our educational system, very clever people learn to ask questions by teaching themselves this skill. However, this is a skill that can be developed more generally and one that can be taught.

Implementation

So how do you motivate people to teach themselves? For some students motivation is not a problem. I try to motivate by giving the best encouragement I can to students. I try to engage their interest by presenting practical information in a sophisticated manner and by stressing concepts and strategies. I assume that if people recognize how fascinating the subject of molecular biology is, this will motivate them to learn (teach themselves) the material in detail.

In BCH 101 students are encouraged to interact with faculty and to ask questions. The designing of these questions is a major proportion of their grade.

There is no formal teaching of question asking skills in BCH 472. Many leading questions are asked of students. It is hoped that they may realize the importance of refining and asking questions as a first step in problem solving.
Back to Burton Page